5 Key Challenges In Call For Content - And How To Solve Them
This is everything we learned in a dynamic discussion with 30 event content pros on their CFP challenges.
This is everything we learned in a dynamic discussion with 30 event content pros on their CFP challenges.
For many event organizers, a Call for Content is the engine that powers their event content strategy. Whether you call it a Call For Papers, Call for Speakers, Call for Abstracts, or Call for Content, the process shapes the quality, diversity, and relevance of your event sessions. Yet, while these are a standard practice in the industry, they are often riddled with challenges: low-quality submissions, repetitive content, and the struggle to attract a diverse, engaging speaker lineup.
In a recent CFP roundtable discussion, 30 event content professionals shared their biggest pain points and the strategies they’re using to improve the submission process, speaker selection, and overall event content quality.
What we learned through discussing these challenges were the best practices to solve these core challenges, and the new emerging trends that are reshaping the way event organizers approach their CFP process.
Your event starts at your call for your content. It’s the first opportunity to begin marketing your event, laying the foundation of your event content strategy, and ensuring that your program and speakers align with the required outcomes of the event. Event success is dependent on ensuring high-quality submissions to build a program that meets the following expectations:
Here is how event teams are driving higher quality submissions.
Many event teams struggle to craft CFP forms that yield useful, detailed submissions without deterring speakers with an overly complex process. If you ask too many questions, applicants may abandon the form. If you ask too few, you risk receiving vague or irrelevant proposals.
Best Practice: Focus on content-first questions in your call content rather than speaker credentials or speaker information. Ask submitters to provide a 280-character session pitch to ensure clarity and conciseness.
Many CFPs result in the same speakers submitting slightly modified versions of last year’s session. This leads to a stale program that fails to bring new insights to attendees.
Best Practice: Require speakers to demonstrate a fresh angle on a topic if they’ve presented it before. Encourage case studies, interactive elements, or hands-on learning experiences.
Passive presentations often result in disengaged audiences. Yet, many CFP submissions lack details on how speakers plan to engage attendees. In the submission form, ask how the speaker plans on how to engage with attendees.
Sample engagement points include:
If you are running a call for lind reviews help eliminate bias by focusing on content quality rather than speaker reputation. However, they may overlook the importance of a speaker’s delivery style and ability to engage an audience.
Kristin Shoop at ACES uses a blind reviews process for content selection and speaker vetting.
Beyond your submissions, teams are also using a speaker outbound strategy to reach out to and select the speakers you want at your event.
Speaker outbound is the proactive, strategic outreach to potential speakers, treating the process much like a sales campaign. Instead of relying solely on inbound submissions through Calls for Papers (CFPs), event content teams take a hands-on approach, identifying and reaching out to ideal speakers to curate a high-quality program.
Where to Source Speakers for Outbound
A well-written proposal doesn’t always mean a speaker is engaging.
There are ways that event teams can assess speaker quality beyond the proposal, including:
Best Practice: meet 1:1 with speakers as a part of the Call For Content process to engage with them more personally, co-workshop content, and guage their speaking abilities.
Many event teams lack a structured way to track speaker performance year over year.
Modern event teams are leveraging a Speaker CRM to track:
Many event teams struggle with defining clear levels of expertise for sessions (Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced) since one person’s “advanced” is another’s “basic.”
Attendees have varying levels of knowledge, making it difficult to standardize session complexity.
Use Bloom’s Taxonomy to classify learning objectives with action-based language (e.g., "Apply X skill" for Intermediate vs. "Analyze Y strategy" for Advanced).
To get a better sense of the accuracy of your session levels, there is no better person to ask than your attendees.
Use post-event surveys to better understand the alignment between the session level and the attendee's level of expertise.
Consider asking questions such as:
Not all event teams have the bandwidth to provide individual speaker coaching.
Pre-recording trainings that are shared across your speaker network are a great way to scale your training efforts.
Consider having recordings include:
Some organizations use AI tools to analyze speaker tone, pacing, and clarity in rehearsals. Others assign experienced speakers as mentors for first-time presenters.
Best Practice: Leverage AI rehearsal tools like Ovation AI or host peer-run speaker training sessions before the event.
Ensuring diverse representation in event content is not just a checkbox—it’s a strategic decision that impacts attendee engagement, thought leadership, and industry progress. However, many event teams struggle to move beyond the same pool of speakers and attract a wider range of voices.
Here’s how to proactively increase speaker diversity in your Call for Papers.
One of the biggest barriers to diversity in CFPs is relying on passive speaker submissions rather than proactively sourcing new voices. Many event teams default to well-known names, which can unintentionally create an exclusive speaker loop that keeps underrepresented voices out.
Intentional Outreach to Affinity Groups & Industry Networks
Strategic Speaker Recruitment Beyond the CFP
Remove Barriers to Entry for New Speakers
Limit Repeat Speakers in Your Program
Pro Tip: In your CFP, explicitly state that your event values diverse perspectives and actively encourages first-time speakers to apply.
If you’re not measuring who is submitting to your CFP, it’s difficult to track diversity improvements. Some events now include optional self-identification questions in their submission forms to better understand speaker representation.
Keep It Optional, Broad, and Respectful
Instead of listing specific demographics, offer a broad self-identification question, such as:
Use Data to Improve Representation
Analyze Speaker Demographics in Relation to Session Selection
Pro Tip: Some organizations go a step further and track panel diversity, ensuring that every panel includes a mix of backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences.
As the events industry evolves, traditional CFP processes are being reimagined to be more flexible, data-driven, and audience-centric. The following trends and best practices help organizers curate higher-quality sessions, improve speaker selection, and enhance attendee engagement.
Many events still operate on a single annual CFP deadline, which can lead to:
🚨 Submission surges right before the deadline
🚨 Rushed, lower-quality proposals
🚨 Limited flexibility in content selection
To combat these issues, some event organizers adopt a rolling CFP approach, accepting speaker proposals at different points throughout the year instead of relying on one single submission window.
Segment into Phases
Take a three-phase approach
Use Rolling CFPs to Maintain Engagement
Optimize for Speaker Selection & Diversity
Pro Tip: Consider keeping the CFP open year-round and reviewing submissions quarterly to ensure fresh, relevant content.
Industries move fast, and event organizers often lock in content months in advance—only to find that the most relevant topics emerge right before the event.
Risk: If content is finalized too early, your agenda may feel outdated by the time the event happens.
Keep 10-20% of Your Program Open
Instead of filling the agenda months in advance, reserve a portion for:
Host a "Hot Topics" Panel
Use CFP Extensions Selectively
Most event teams rely on spreadsheets or ad-hoc notes to track speaker participation, leading to missed opportunities and repeated programming.
A Speaker Database (Speaker CRM) ensures:
Track Key Speaker Metrics
Segment Speakers by Strengths
Build Relationships for Future Events
Pro Tip: Implement a speaker tagging system (e.g., "Top-Rated," "High Engagement," "Panel Expert") to easily filter the best fits for each event.
Traditional CFPs put full control in the hands of organizers, but some events are now giving attendees a voice in content selection.
Let the community help shape the agenda through upvoting and crowdsourced submissions.
Allow Attendees to Vote on Proposed Sessions
Host an “Open Call” for Session Topics
Run “Lightning Round” Audience-Picked Sessions
Pro Tip: Use online polls, event apps, or Slack communities to get real-time audience feedback on session topics.
Speakers are most engaged immediately after an event. Consider having your next Call For Content ready at the end of your current event while ideas are still fresh for your attendees, speakers, vendors, and team.
The Call for Papers process is no longer just about collecting submissions—it’s about strategically shaping the content, speakers, and conversations that define your event. The days of a single, rigid CFP deadline and repetitive speaker lineups are fading. Instead, event organizers are embracing new models that prioritize engagement, diversity, and data-driven decision-making.
By rethinking how we structure CFPs, event teams can move from a transactional process to a strategic content engine that continuously fuels their events, marketing efforts, and thought leadership initiatives. The most forward-thinking event teams are already:
Expanding the speaker pipeline to bring in new, diverse voices through intentional outreach and targeted recruitment.
✅ Adopting rolling CFPs to maintain agility and keep content fresh throughout the year.
✅ Leaving space for last-minute, high-impact topics to ensure relevancy in fast-changing industries.
✅ Using speaker databases strategically to track and nurture relationships with top talent.
✅ Empowering attendees to co-create the agenda through upvoting, crowdsourced submissions, and community-driven programming.
The CFP process is evolving—and now is the time to experiment, refine, and innovate. Whether it’s optimizing how you review submissions, diversifying your speaker lineup, or leveraging automation, every event team has opportunities to elevate their approach and deliver greater impact.
Now it’s your turn:
If you’re looking for more guidance, templates, or best practices, explore our [Strategic Guide to Call for Papers] or connect with industry leaders who are redefining event content.
Let’s build the next generation of impactful, inclusive, and engaging conferences—one submission at a time.